Investment Arbitration / Singapore

Singapore CA Reviews Scope Of Arbitrator’s Jurisdiction In Investment Arbitration

- by Phillip Rompotis
Singapore Court of Appeal reviews the scope of an arbitrator’s jurisdiction in an investment arbitration

Baker McKenzie review the Singapore Court of Appeal’s 2016 decision in Sanum Investments Ltd v Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic [2016] SGCA 57, where the CA handed down its first decision dealing with the validity of an investment-treaty arbitration award.

… READ MORE

Related Posts

Not using arbitration - Beware!

Norton Rose Fulbright International Arbitration Report (Issue No.12 – May 2019)

Facilitating the Belt and Road CIETAC launches investment arbitration rules

Facilitating The Belt And Road: CIETAC Launches Investment Arbitration Rules

CIETAC Investment Arbitration Rules seek to fill a gap in Chinese investment treaty disputes

CIETAC Investment Arbitration Rules Seek To Fill A Gap In Chinese Investment Treaty Disputes

About Phillip Rompotis

Phillip practices as a barrister and arbitrator in Hong Kong. He has over 25 years’ litigation and arbitration experience in commercial disputes relating to construction & engineering, financial services, joint venture & shareholders agreements, technology, trusts, property and landlord & tenant. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, the Hong Kong Institute of Arbitrators, the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators, the Malaysian Institute of Arbitrators, and a member of various lists/panels of arbitrators.

View

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *