HK Court Refuses Enforcement Of Chinese Award On Public Policy Grounds

Hong Kong Court refuses to enforce a Chinese Arbitration Award on public policy grounds

Parties regularly seek to set aside or resist enforcement of arbitration awards on the basis that the award contravenes public policy (usually in combination with other grounds in Article V of the New York Convention). The argument rarely succeeds but it did so in the Hong Kong High Court’s 2018 decision in Z v Y [2018] HKCFI 2342.

Stephenson Harwood reviews the case, where the Court enforcement under section 95(3)(b) of the Arbitration Ordinance on the basis that it would be contrary to public policy to enforce an award on the basis that there were valid grounds to claim that a guarantee to secure obligations were “tainted by illegality” and the tribunal had not addressed them. … READ MORE

See also the articles published by/in:

About Phillip Rompotis

Phillip practices as a barrister and arbitrator in Hong Kong. He has over 25 years’ litigation and arbitration experience in commercial disputes relating to construction & engineering, financial services, joint venture & shareholders agreements, technology, trusts, property and landlord & tenant. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, the Hong Kong Institute of Arbitrators, the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators, the Malaysian Institute of Arbitrators, and a member of various lists/panels of arbitrators.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *