The Singapore CA finds that the Respondent’s set-aside application was filed more than three months after the award had been received by the parties; as the Court did not have any power to extend this time limit, the challenge was time- barred.
The HK Court confirms an earlier decision holding that there is no provision in the Arrangement Concerning Mutual Enforcement of Arbitral Awards that the limitation period should not run while a successful party seeks to enforce an award in China.
Practitioners regularly encounter time bar and limitations issues when seeking to enforce or resist enforcement …Continue Reading
Latham & Watkins consider the English Court of Appeal’s 2018 decision in Haven Insurance Company …Continue Reading
Herbert Smith Freehills review an award dated 9 March 2017, where the Tribunal in an …Continue Reading