没有根据自然正义或管辖权理由撤销裁决的依据
The Singapore Court of Appeal finds no basis to set aside an award on the grounds of excess of jurisdiction and/or breach of natural justice, and refuses to adopt the Hong Kong position of an award of indemnity costs against the unsuccessful party.
自然正义奖在新加坡被搁置
The Singapore High Court deals with a tribunal’s decision to deny a party a right to respond to new arguments introduced at the very end of the arbitral proceedings, deciding to set aside part of the award.
新加坡的自然正义与司法管辖权问题
The Singapore Court of Appeal deals with the issue of whether a tribunal has the power to convene a hearing only for oral submissions in circumstances where a party requests a hearing to submit oral evidence.
新加坡法院拒绝申请撤销裁决
The High Court of Singapore refuses to set aside an award on the basis that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction or by reason of a breach of natural justice and reviews the applicable legal principles under Article 34 of the Model Law.
新加坡法院审查自然正义与公共政策原则
In considering a challenge to a domestic international award arising out of the sale and purchase of vessels, the Singapore High Court reviews the applicable principles of breach of natural justice and public policy.
法院拒绝基于自然公正裁定裁决
The Singapore Court of Appeal declines to set aside an award on the grounds of breach of natural justice in proceedings arising out of the termination of a construction contract.
不违反自然正义和公共政策
The Privy Council (on appeal from Mauritius) upholds a decision of the Supreme Court of Mauritius which refused to set aside an arbitral award on the basis of alleged breaches of natural justice and public policy.
新加坡法院澄清了《示范法》第34条第3款规定的时限，并拒绝了自然正义异议
The Singapore court clarifies the applicable time limits under Art.34(3) Model Law and rejects a broad range of natural justice objections as disguised appeals on the merits.
法院考虑否定管辖权的决定并拒绝搁置
The High Court deals with an argument that a partial award constitutes a negative jurisdiction decision and various arguments that the award should be set aside under Article 34(2) of the Model Law.
印度高等法院执行裁决并指示支付押金
Enforcement of SIAC awards challenged on a number of grounds, including jurisdiction and breach of natural justice, rejected by the Delhi High Court who orders the judgment debtor to deposit the underlying sum.
Khaitan & Co review the Indian High Court’s decision in Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co …
Continue Reading
Phillip Rompotis reviews the mid-May 2019 decision in P v D and others [2019] EWHC …
Continue Reading
Linklaters review of the Singapore High Court’s 2018 decision in China Machine New Energy Corp …
Continue Reading